Home / Case Studies / EV HV DC Contact Plate

EV High Voltage DC Contact Plate: C110 Copper Machining Case Study

A flat contact plate machined from C110 copper that carries high current between the moving armature and fixed terminals in an EV DC relay or contactor. The part geometry is straightforward — a flat plate with mounting holes and a contact surface. The manufacturing challenge is not complexity but material behavior. C110 copper is among the most electrically conductive metals available, but it is soft, gummy during machining, and prone to oxidation. Getting consistent dimensional accuracy, clean machined edges, and a reliable silver-plated surface requires specific tooling choices and process discipline.

Project at a Glance

Key Parameters

ItemSpec
ApplicationHV DC relay/contactor switching mechanism (EV)
Contact Plate MaterialC110 copper (99.9% purity)
Armature MaterialDT4C electrical steel
Dimensional Tolerance±0.005 mm (critical features)
Electrical Conductivity≥ 58 MS/m (≥ 100% IACS)
Surface Finish (contact face)Silver plating 5–10 μm
Secondary PlatingTin plating 3–5 μm (non-contact areas)
ComplianceIATF 16949:2016, ISO 9001:2015
MOQ100 pcs

Critical Dimensions

FeatureTolerance
Contact face flatness≤ 0.005 mm
Plate thickness±0.005 mm
Mounting hole position±0.01 mm
Mounting hole diameter±0.005 mm
Contact surface Ra≤ 1.6 μm (before plating)
Overall length / width±0.02 mm
Parallelism (top to bottom)≤ 0.005 mm

1. Material Selection: Conductivity vs Machinability vs Cost

Contact plates in EV high voltage relays serve as the conductive bridge between the relay's moving armature and the fixed busbar or terminal connection. The primary requirement is maximum current-carrying capacity with minimum voltage drop. This points directly to high-purity copper. However, the choice between copper alloys involves trade-offs in strength, machinability, and cost that are worth examining.

MaterialIACS ConductivityTensile StrengthMachinabilityCost IndexVerdict
C110 (ETP Cu) ≥ 101% IACS 220 MPa (annealed) Difficult — gummy 1.0x First choice for contact plates
C17200 (BeCu) ~22% IACS 1200+ MPa (aged) Moderate 5.0x Unnecessary here — contact plates are not spring-loaded
C36000 (Brass) ~26% IACS 350 MPa Excellent (free-cutting) 0.8x Too resistive for high-current switching
Al 6061-T6 ~43% IACS 310 MPa Good 0.4x Inadequate conductivity for main current path
Why C110, not C17200: For relay contacts that close under spring force and experience repeated arc strikes, C17200 beryllium copper is the correct choice because it combines strength with adequate conductivity. But a contact plate is a different component — it is a flat bus-bar-style conductor bolted or welded into the relay housing. It does not experience spring loading or repeated impact. The design priority is pure conductivity, which makes C110 the better choice at lower cost and with simpler processing (no age hardening required).

2. Why C110 Copper for This Application

C110 (UNS C11000), also known as ETP (Electrolytic Tough Pitch) copper, is 99.9% pure copper with a small amount of oxygen (0.04%) that improves workability. It has the highest electrical conductivity of any commercially available copper alloy, which is the primary reason it is specified for contact plates in high-current switching applications.

PropertyValueDesign Implication
Density8.89 g/cm³Heavy — contributes to relay assembly weight
Tensile Strength220 MPa (annealed)Sufficient for bolted connection — plate does not carry mechanical load
Electrical Conductivity≥ 58 MS/m (≥ 101% IACS)Minimizes resistive heating at high current. Voltage drop across plate is negligible
Thermal Conductivity391 W/m·KDissipates heat generated during switching events
Hardness~40 HRB (annealed)Soft material — requires careful handling and fixturing during machining
Cost (plate/blank)$8–12/kg (bulk)Competitive for automotive volumes. LME-linked pricing

The Trade-off: Soft Material, Handling Challenges

C110's main disadvantage is its low hardness. At ~40 HRB in the annealed condition, the material dents and scratches easily. During machining, thin plates can deform under clamping pressure. During handling between operations, the contact surface can be scratched by fixtures, conveyors, or operator gloves. Any surface damage that survives into the plating stage becomes a permanent defect — silver plating follows the substrate contour, so a scratch in the copper appears as a scratch in the finished part.

Silver Plating Necessity

Bare C110 copper oxidizes quickly in air, forming a dark copper oxide layer within hours. This oxide layer has significantly higher contact resistance than clean copper, which would cause excessive voltage drop and localized heating at the contact interface. Silver plating (5–10 μm on the contact face) provides two benefits:

  1. Oxidation resistance: Silver oxide is conductive, unlike copper oxide. The contact face maintains low and stable contact resistance over the relay's service life.
  2. Enhanced conductivity: Silver has ~106% IACS conductivity — marginally better than copper. On a 5–10 μm layer, this contribution is small in absolute terms, but it ensures the contact interface is the best possible conductor.

3. Machining Strategy

3.1 CNC Milling: The Primary Process

Contact plates are flat parts with relatively simple geometry — the main profile, mounting holes, and sometimes locating features or alignment tabs. CNC milling is the appropriate process. The part is machined from a copper blank (saw-cut plate or saw-cut bar stock, depending on geometry).

3.2 The Core Challenge: Copper Is Gummy

Unlike aluminum or steel, C110 copper does not produce clean, well-broken chips during milling. Instead, it generates long, stringy chips that can wrap around the tool, drag across the machined surface, and leave embedded debris. This is the single biggest machining challenge for copper contact plates. The solutions are specific tool geometry and cutting parameters:

3.3 Surface Preparation for Silver Plating

The quality of the silver-plated surface depends on the condition of the copper substrate. Before plating, the contact face must meet specific requirements:

3.4 Handling Thin Plates

Contact plates are typically 2–6 mm thick. Thin copper plates deflect under clamping pressure, which causes dimensional variation in flatness and thickness. The approach is to machine the parts from oversized blanks and use soft-jaw fixtures with even clamping distribution. Vacuum fixtures are another option for very thin plates (< 2 mm). After machining, parts are inspected for flatness before proceeding to plating.

Stacking and tab handling: For production efficiency, multiple contact plates can be stacked and machined simultaneously if the geometry permits. Tab connections between parts in the stack must be designed to be thin enough for easy break-off after machining, but thick enough to hold the parts securely during cutting. Typically 0.3–0.5 mm tabs work well for C110 copper plates up to 4 mm thick.

4. Quality Testing

TestMethodCriteriaFrequency
Dimensional inspection CMM (coordinate measuring machine) Flatness ≤ 0.005 mm, thickness ±0.005 mm, mounting hole position ±0.01 mm First article + 5 pcs/shift
Surface roughness Contact profilometer Ra ≤ 1.6 μm on contact face (before plating) 5 pcs/shift
Electrical conductivity Eddy current conductivity meter ≥ 100% IACS (≥ 58 MS/m) Per incoming material lot
Silver plating thickness X-ray fluorescence (XRF) or cross-section microscopy 5–10 μm on contact face, 3–5 μm tin on non-contact areas Per plating batch (5 pcs)
Plating adhesion Tape test per ASTM D3359 No peeling or flaking Per plating batch (3 pcs)
Salt spray testing ASTM B117, 48–96 hours No substrate corrosion, plating intact Per qualification (sample 3 pcs)
Conductivity testing before plating. Measure the bare copper conductivity before sending parts to the plating line. Silver has ~106% IACS, which would mask any issues with the base material. If the incoming copper lot does not meet the 100% IACS minimum, reject it at receiving — plating over sub-standard material will not fix the problem.

5. Cost Drivers: Where the Money Goes

Cost Driver% of Unit CostHow to Optimize
Raw material (C110 copper) 25–35% Copper plate or bar at $8–12/kg. Material cost is significant because copper is dense (8.89 g/cm³) and the part is solid copper with no opportunity for material removal savings. Buy in annual contracts to lock pricing against LME volatility. Nest multiple parts per blank to improve material utilization
CNC machining 20–30% Copper machines quickly but chip control slows feed rates. Sharp tools with high rake angles reduce cutting forces. PCD end mills for finishing last 5–10x longer than carbide on copper. Fixture design matters — good fixturing reduces setup time and scrap
Silver plating 15–25% Silver is a precious metal with volatile pricing. Selective plating (silver on contact face only, tin elsewhere) reduces silver consumption. Rack plating for precise thickness control. Barrel plating is cheaper but risks part-to-part contact damage on thin plates
Testing + inspection 5–10% Automated CMM fixtures for dimensional checks. XRF for plating thickness verification. Eddy current probe for inline conductivity screening of incoming material lots
Tooling amortization 3–5% Milling fixtures, soft jaws, plating racks. Spread over production volume. PCD end mills cost more upfront ($200–500 per tool) but last significantly longer on copper than uncoated carbide

6. Common Mistakes That Reduce First-Article Yield

Mistake 1: Using standard steel-cutting tool geometry for copper. Carbide end mills designed for steel or stainless steel typically have lower rake angles (5–10 degrees) that cause the tool to rub rather than cut in copper. This generates excessive heat, work-hardens the copper surface, and produces a poor finish with built-up edge. Always use tools with high positive rake (15–25 degrees) specifically intended for non-ferrous metals.
Mistake 2: Insufficient chip evacuation. Copper's gummy chip formation means chips do not break cleanly. If chips accumulate in the cutting zone, they get re-cut, leaving deep tool marks and embedded copper particles on the contact face. These defects show through the plated surface. Flood coolant with good flow coverage and coolant-through tooling are essential. Peck milling cycles help for deeper features.
Mistake 3: Inadequate deburring. Machining burrs on mounting hole edges and plate perimeters interfere with assembly fit. More importantly, burrs on the contact face perimeter create local high current density points during operation, leading to uneven heating and accelerated wear. Vibratory finishing or manual deburring with Scotch-Brite pads under 10x magnification is recommended for the contact face edge.
Mistake 4: Poor plating adhesion due to surface contamination. If cutting fluid residue, copper fines, or fingerprint oils remain on the contact face before plating, the silver layer will not bond properly. During thermal cycling in service, the plating can blister or peel. The result is exposed copper oxide at the contact interface and rising contact resistance. A multi-stage cleaning process (alkaline degreaser, acid etch, DI water rinse) before plating is standard practice.
Mistake 5: Clamping damage on thin plates. Standard vise jaws or toggle clamps apply concentrated pressure that dents soft C110 copper. The resulting flatness variation (often exceeding the 0.005 mm specification) requires rework or scrap. Use custom soft-jaw fixtures with even pressure distribution, or vacuum chucking for plates thinner than 2 mm. Always verify flatness after unclamping before sending parts to the next operation.

7. Production Timeline

PhaseDurationDeliverable
DFM review & quotation2–3 daysUpdated drawing with DFM notes, material spec confirmation, formal quote
Prototype machining3–5 days10–20 prototype parts, dimensional reports
Plating setup & first plated samples3–5 daysSilver/tin plated samples, XRF thickness verification
First-article inspection2–3 daysFull CMM report, conductivity test, plating adhesion test
PPAP documentation (if required)5–7 daysPSW, control plan, FMEA, material certs, capability studies
Production2–3 weeksFirst production shipment
Total (prototype to first production shipment)3–5 weeksProduction parts with quality documentation
About this case study This technical analysis is based on an EV high voltage DC contact plate program produced at Sinbo Precision. Specific customer details, exact part numbers, and proprietary design features have been modified or omitted. All process parameters, material data, and tolerance values are representative of typical EV contact plate requirements for automotive switching components.

Need a Quote for EV Contact Plates?

Send us your drawing — we'll return a DFM review and quote within 3 business days.

Get a Quote →