A flat contact plate machined from C110 copper that carries high current between the moving armature and fixed terminals in an EV DC relay or contactor. The part geometry is straightforward — a flat plate with mounting holes and a contact surface. The manufacturing challenge is not complexity but material behavior. C110 copper is among the most electrically conductive metals available, but it is soft, gummy during machining, and prone to oxidation. Getting consistent dimensional accuracy, clean machined edges, and a reliable silver-plated surface requires specific tooling choices and process discipline.
| Item | Spec |
|---|---|
| Application | HV DC relay/contactor switching mechanism (EV) |
| Contact Plate Material | C110 copper (99.9% purity) |
| Armature Material | DT4C electrical steel |
| Dimensional Tolerance | ±0.005 mm (critical features) |
| Electrical Conductivity | ≥ 58 MS/m (≥ 100% IACS) |
| Surface Finish (contact face) | Silver plating 5–10 μm |
| Secondary Plating | Tin plating 3–5 μm (non-contact areas) |
| Compliance | IATF 16949:2016, ISO 9001:2015 |
| MOQ | 100 pcs |
| Feature | Tolerance |
|---|---|
| Contact face flatness | ≤ 0.005 mm |
| Plate thickness | ±0.005 mm |
| Mounting hole position | ±0.01 mm |
| Mounting hole diameter | ±0.005 mm |
| Contact surface Ra | ≤ 1.6 μm (before plating) |
| Overall length / width | ±0.02 mm |
| Parallelism (top to bottom) | ≤ 0.005 mm |
Contact plates in EV high voltage relays serve as the conductive bridge between the relay's moving armature and the fixed busbar or terminal connection. The primary requirement is maximum current-carrying capacity with minimum voltage drop. This points directly to high-purity copper. However, the choice between copper alloys involves trade-offs in strength, machinability, and cost that are worth examining.
| Material | IACS Conductivity | Tensile Strength | Machinability | Cost Index | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C110 (ETP Cu) | ≥ 101% IACS | 220 MPa (annealed) | Difficult — gummy | 1.0x | First choice for contact plates |
| C17200 (BeCu) | ~22% IACS | 1200+ MPa (aged) | Moderate | 5.0x | Unnecessary here — contact plates are not spring-loaded |
| C36000 (Brass) | ~26% IACS | 350 MPa | Excellent (free-cutting) | 0.8x | Too resistive for high-current switching |
| Al 6061-T6 | ~43% IACS | 310 MPa | Good | 0.4x | Inadequate conductivity for main current path |
C110 (UNS C11000), also known as ETP (Electrolytic Tough Pitch) copper, is 99.9% pure copper with a small amount of oxygen (0.04%) that improves workability. It has the highest electrical conductivity of any commercially available copper alloy, which is the primary reason it is specified for contact plates in high-current switching applications.
| Property | Value | Design Implication |
|---|---|---|
| Density | 8.89 g/cm³ | Heavy — contributes to relay assembly weight |
| Tensile Strength | 220 MPa (annealed) | Sufficient for bolted connection — plate does not carry mechanical load |
| Electrical Conductivity | ≥ 58 MS/m (≥ 101% IACS) | Minimizes resistive heating at high current. Voltage drop across plate is negligible |
| Thermal Conductivity | 391 W/m·K | Dissipates heat generated during switching events |
| Hardness | ~40 HRB (annealed) | Soft material — requires careful handling and fixturing during machining |
| Cost (plate/blank) | $8–12/kg (bulk) | Competitive for automotive volumes. LME-linked pricing |
C110's main disadvantage is its low hardness. At ~40 HRB in the annealed condition, the material dents and scratches easily. During machining, thin plates can deform under clamping pressure. During handling between operations, the contact surface can be scratched by fixtures, conveyors, or operator gloves. Any surface damage that survives into the plating stage becomes a permanent defect — silver plating follows the substrate contour, so a scratch in the copper appears as a scratch in the finished part.
Bare C110 copper oxidizes quickly in air, forming a dark copper oxide layer within hours. This oxide layer has significantly higher contact resistance than clean copper, which would cause excessive voltage drop and localized heating at the contact interface. Silver plating (5–10 μm on the contact face) provides two benefits:
Contact plates are flat parts with relatively simple geometry — the main profile, mounting holes, and sometimes locating features or alignment tabs. CNC milling is the appropriate process. The part is machined from a copper blank (saw-cut plate or saw-cut bar stock, depending on geometry).
Unlike aluminum or steel, C110 copper does not produce clean, well-broken chips during milling. Instead, it generates long, stringy chips that can wrap around the tool, drag across the machined surface, and leave embedded debris. This is the single biggest machining challenge for copper contact plates. The solutions are specific tool geometry and cutting parameters:
The quality of the silver-plated surface depends on the condition of the copper substrate. Before plating, the contact face must meet specific requirements:
Contact plates are typically 2–6 mm thick. Thin copper plates deflect under clamping pressure, which causes dimensional variation in flatness and thickness. The approach is to machine the parts from oversized blanks and use soft-jaw fixtures with even clamping distribution. Vacuum fixtures are another option for very thin plates (< 2 mm). After machining, parts are inspected for flatness before proceeding to plating.
| Test | Method | Criteria | Frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimensional inspection | CMM (coordinate measuring machine) | Flatness ≤ 0.005 mm, thickness ±0.005 mm, mounting hole position ±0.01 mm | First article + 5 pcs/shift |
| Surface roughness | Contact profilometer | Ra ≤ 1.6 μm on contact face (before plating) | 5 pcs/shift |
| Electrical conductivity | Eddy current conductivity meter | ≥ 100% IACS (≥ 58 MS/m) | Per incoming material lot |
| Silver plating thickness | X-ray fluorescence (XRF) or cross-section microscopy | 5–10 μm on contact face, 3–5 μm tin on non-contact areas | Per plating batch (5 pcs) |
| Plating adhesion | Tape test per ASTM D3359 | No peeling or flaking | Per plating batch (3 pcs) |
| Salt spray testing | ASTM B117, 48–96 hours | No substrate corrosion, plating intact | Per qualification (sample 3 pcs) |
| Cost Driver | % of Unit Cost | How to Optimize |
|---|---|---|
| Raw material (C110 copper) | 25–35% | Copper plate or bar at $8–12/kg. Material cost is significant because copper is dense (8.89 g/cm³) and the part is solid copper with no opportunity for material removal savings. Buy in annual contracts to lock pricing against LME volatility. Nest multiple parts per blank to improve material utilization |
| CNC machining | 20–30% | Copper machines quickly but chip control slows feed rates. Sharp tools with high rake angles reduce cutting forces. PCD end mills for finishing last 5–10x longer than carbide on copper. Fixture design matters — good fixturing reduces setup time and scrap |
| Silver plating | 15–25% | Silver is a precious metal with volatile pricing. Selective plating (silver on contact face only, tin elsewhere) reduces silver consumption. Rack plating for precise thickness control. Barrel plating is cheaper but risks part-to-part contact damage on thin plates |
| Testing + inspection | 5–10% | Automated CMM fixtures for dimensional checks. XRF for plating thickness verification. Eddy current probe for inline conductivity screening of incoming material lots |
| Tooling amortization | 3–5% | Milling fixtures, soft jaws, plating racks. Spread over production volume. PCD end mills cost more upfront ($200–500 per tool) but last significantly longer on copper than uncoated carbide |
| Phase | Duration | Deliverable |
|---|---|---|
| DFM review & quotation | 2–3 days | Updated drawing with DFM notes, material spec confirmation, formal quote |
| Prototype machining | 3–5 days | 10–20 prototype parts, dimensional reports |
| Plating setup & first plated samples | 3–5 days | Silver/tin plated samples, XRF thickness verification |
| First-article inspection | 2–3 days | Full CMM report, conductivity test, plating adhesion test |
| PPAP documentation (if required) | 5–7 days | PSW, control plan, FMEA, material certs, capability studies |
| Production | 2–3 weeks | First production shipment |
| Total (prototype to first production shipment) | 3–5 weeks | Production parts with quality documentation |
Send us your drawing — we'll return a DFM review and quote within 3 business days.
Get a Quote →